The case for single child families

Phil McGuire wanted his vasectomy patients to answer before he performed The Procedure: And it is not easily dismissed. Pro-choice activists, she observed, were almost obsessed with planning for their children, trying to give them "maximum parental guidance and every possible advantage," while parents active in the antiabortion movement "tend to be laissez-faire individualists in their attitude" toward child-rearing.

This article is adapted from Maybe One: We should add a holiday to the calendar of every church to celebrate this achievement.

Maybe One: A Case for Smaller Families

Though I disagreed with some of his stands, I found much of his language powerful and intriguing. In truth, this reason has always bothered me as I feel like the main reason to have a second child should be that we as the parents really want a second child. And the energy freed by having smaller families may be some of the energy needed to take on these next challenges.

In fact, six in ten women having abortions did so because their contraceptives failed; among typical couples, 18 percent using diaphragms and 12 percent using condoms managed to get pregnant.

Not only that, those with few children might become too wealthy, which was as dangerous as being too poor. So is there a different way to achieve some of that maturity, with no children or only a single child to change your life. The notion cannot be easily dismissed.

It all added up. Feed the hungry, clothe the naked, comfort the oppressed; love your neighbor as yourself; heal the earth. We dominate the earth. The problem, of course, is that now we live in an era—maybe only a brief one, maybe only for a few generations—when parenting a bunch of kids clashes with the good of the planet.

But it came and went and the second baby seed was not planted. But this seemed so final. Then he cauterized it and put it back inside, repeating the procedure on the other side. Blending scripture and the words of ancient philosophers with a welter of statistical projections, McKibben explores the hopes and fears that attach themselves to the birth of babies, including the racism that often colors discussion of immigration and family planning.

It offers a kind of freedom. And yet when I think of my circle of friends and acquaintances, the single most common route to maturity has been through raising children, often lots of them.

And the energy freed by having smaller families may be some of the energy needed to take on these next challenges. His reasonable, predictable, and loosely developed argument will thus appeal to those willing to be converted, but probably wont do much to change the birth rate.

The notion cannot be easily dismissed. So if I was serious about stopping at one child, this was where I belonged. Current articles and subscription information can be found at www. When she began studying the differences between pro-choice and pro-life advocates in the abortion dispute, Kristin Luker noticed something interesting.

He spends time demolishing the well-worn belief that single children are necessarily antisocial and spoiled, pointing out that the turn-of-the-century psychological report on which that belief is based was incorrect on several counts.

They felt differently about God, about the role of women and, most interestingly, they felt very differently about the nature of planning. Share What Others Have Said About Maybe One "By reminding us that an only child is only and completely a child, not a freak or part of an unfinished family, he makes two children seem like a lucky luxury.

Parenthood, I believed, would certainly spell the end of our nightly candlelit sandalwood-scented bubble baths complete with silly bath toys, where we played like children in a deliciously adult incarnation. I have one child; she is the light of my life; she makes me care far more about the future than I used to.

But there is something else unique about it—it is the first commandment we have fulfilled. And the list, of course, is long. That way of seeing the world attracts me—there is in its spontaneity and confidence something of real beauty. But a lot can happen between now and then.

Living as if you were the most important thing on earth is, literally, blasphemy; recreational sex may not bother me, but recreational life does.

This was not always the case. The Case for Single-child Families. by Bill McKibben. Bill McKibben is Sunday school superintendent at a United Methodist church in upstate New York. He is the author of The End of Nature, The Age of Missing Information, Maybe One: A Case for Smaller Families and, most recently.

EBSCOhost serves thousands of libraries with premium essays, articles and other content including The case for single-child families. Get access to over 12 million other articles! Maybe One: A Case for Smaller Families [Bill McKibben] on *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers.

Bill McKibben argues that the earth is becoming dangerously overcrowded, and that if more of us chose to have only one childReviews: Maybe One. A Case for Smaller Families. The father of a single child himself, McKibben maintains that bringing one, and no more than one, child into this world will hurt neither your family nor our nation—indeed, it can be an optimistic step toward the future.

Single-Parenting Families: Attached Stigmas The social deviance that interests me is single parenting, one who chose to have a child out of wed-lock.

Rhetorical Analysis

The stigma attached to being a single parent is rising anew. May 01,  · A very thorough argument for single-child families, and one that I wholeheartedly agree with (if you plan to have your own biological children). For people like me who hope to not reproduce, however, he doesn't give that perspective as much weight/5.

The case for single child families
Rated 3/5 based on 3 review
The Case for Single-child Families – Religion Online